[Chosen One]

I have always understood the importance of this problem in practice. Plus, over time, studying European history and philosophy I have come to the realization that race is somewhat of a fuzzy concept, with a slight degree of subjectivity. Many have their own standards and specific criterea, for instance Hitler himself apparently even accepted some jews into the SS as "honorary Aryans" (a member just informed me of this trivia yesterday), while a couple people have just expressed their much more extreme and philosophically simplistic standards (without specifying the definitions in play).

I think most people intuitively can grasp race to some degree, right? We dont all have to come up with some technical definition of what the color green is in order to be able to tell someone to pick up the green book on the table and be understood. So my standard is that if I, being highly educated on race, look at someone (and their family) and can't see any other genetics in them, they behave White culturally, and hold proWhite views, then I dont care about anything more than that unless a verified White Nationalist has some reason to veto them.

I believe this is the most valid approach for racial and political success at scale, without sacrificing integrity of blood to any significant degree.

The real problems are introduced when trying to develop bureaucratic and legalistic systems highly dependant on complex organization and specification across a large staff. But thats not what this thread is about. When White Nationalism has achieved a public level of control within government then THAT particular can of worms would have to be addressed, or possibly bypassed altogether.



And for the record, I would have agreed with Himmler, there should not have been any jews in the SS.